resourceone.info Lifestyle Cbse Name Correction Form Pdf

CBSE NAME CORRECTION FORM PDF

Saturday, April 27, 2019


FORMAT FOR CORRECTION IN NAME OF CANDIDATE/MOTHER/FATHER TO a) Admission form in Class I(copy duty attested to be . supplied by the CBSE. FORMAT FOR CORRECTION IN NAME OF CANDIDATE/MOTHER/FATHER TO BE Admission form in class (copy duly attested to be attached). Application Form for obtaining Migration Certificate, Manual form: 1. छात्र/ छात्रा का नाम/ Name of the candidate .. Forms page of CBSE website resourceone.info and send the request to correct Regional Office.


Cbse Name Correction Form Pdf

Author:MONSERRATE JAKEMAN
Language:English, Spanish, Japanese
Country:Tuvalu
Genre:Lifestyle
Pages:278
Published (Last):07.07.2016
ISBN:897-9-60826-832-8
ePub File Size:24.44 MB
PDF File Size:9.12 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Regsitration Required]
Downloads:24638
Uploaded by: LILLIAN

I have observed that issues relating to change of names or surname of candidates in their Application Forms, Qualifying Certificates etc. Para II (6): No. (Date Sheet) CBSE: Class Board Exam (Download) CBSE Board Exam Model Papers · (Download) CBSE Text Books - FREE PDF · Download Free. Step 1: Downloading & Printing the Application form given below and Take a printout of the Application form. resourceone.info

State of T. It has been held that Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, clearly reveals that there is no legal requirement that public or other official book shall be kept by a public officer but what is required is that it should be kept regularly in discharge of official duties.

The doctrine means that if something was done before a legal dispute arose, then it was done at the time when the declarant had no motive to lie. It was held that that entry relating to date of birth made in the school register is relevant and admissible under Section 35 of the Act though entry regarding age of a person in school register is not much of evidentiary value to prove the age of the person in the absence of material on which the age was recorded.

Latest News

The Court held as under:- " It is trite that to render a document admissible under Section 35 , three conditions have to be satisfied, namely; i entry that is relied on must be one in a public or other official book, register or record; ii it must be an entry stating a fact in issue or a relevant fact, and iii it must be made by a public servant in discharge of his official duties, or in performance of his duty especially enjoined by law.

An entry relating to date of birth made in the school register is relevant and admissible under Section 35 of the Act but the entry regarding the age of a person in a school register is of not much evidentiary value to prove the age of the person in the absence of the material on which the age was recorded see Mal Singhvi v. Dinesh and another, 3 SCC , a two Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court returned a finding that the entry of date of birth in the admission form in the school record does not satisfy the condition laid down in Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act.

Attention of the Court was not drawn to any of the judgments referred to above, including the judgment of the larger Benches. Therefore, the judgment in Jabbar Singh's case supra , cannot be said to be binding decision in the face of the judgments of the larger Bench. Thus, we find that the entries made in the school register, be it Government or private school, much before any issue of correct date of birth arises for consideration are relevant, in terms of Section 35 of the Evidence Act.

It satisfies the test i. The entry of date of birth is a relevant fact and that it is made by a public servant in discharge of his official duties in case of a Government school and in performance of a duty enjoined by law in case of a private school.

Thus entries of date of birth made in the School records are relevant. As per Section 8 of the said Act, the birth is required to be reported to the Registering Officer in all conceivable situations. The reporting of birth, if not made within the prescribed period, is permitted after payment of fine again for delay in reporting.

The failure to report birth incurs the risk of prosecution and the penalties. Thus, such provision of recording of date of birth with the Registrar of Births and Deaths is mandatory. Therefore, we find that the issue is required to be examined in respect of the persons born prior to the commencement of the Act i. A matriculation certificate issued by the School Education Board was made basis of age while entering Government service as per the Civil Services Rules, as reproduced above and applicable in this part of the country.

However, it was subject to change in the manner prescribed in the Punjab Civil Services Rules and the Financial Rules.

Though on the basis of the doctrine of Ante Litem Motam, a person cannot be permitted to dispute the entry of the date of birth in the matriculation certificate, yet the limited right granted to the Government servant could be exercised only in the manner contemplated in Annexure-A, of Punjab Civil Services Rules, as reproduced above.

Para 2 of the Annexure A has lost its purpose after enactment of the Act, where the reference is made to other sources of information such as Janam Patris or Horoscope.

The Act gives statutory recognition to the birth certificates. It is a mandatory requirement for all persons in all conceivable situations to report about the birth and death to the Registration Officers.

संबंधता - Online School Affiliation & Monitoring System R-2.0

The Central Board of Secondary Education makes it mandatory to produce date of birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, wherever existed, as proof of date of birth.

If a person does not give date of birth certificate issued by the Registrar at the time of admission to a school, he does it at his own peril. Once he has disclosed a particular date of birth, completed education; he is estopped to rely upon the birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, at a later stage of life. Therefore, once a candidate has completed his education on the basis of an assumed date, in conflict with the birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Birth and Deaths, he is estopped to rely upon the birth certificate at the later stage of life.

The date of birth cannot be permitted to be corrected in terms of the regulation of the School Board merely because in a birth certificate issued by the Registrar, there is a different date than what is mentioned in the matriculation certificate.

Student Information Section

The correction permitted is of clerical mistakes from the details given in the admission form. It does not entitle a student to seek complete change of date of birth than given in the admission form from the Central Board of Secondary Education. No premium can be given to a candidate having qualified matriculation examination with a particular date of birth on the ground that he came to know about his correct date of birth later.

It is giving a premium to one for one's own conscious action. Shant Kumar Agarwal, AIR SC , when the Court found that since at the time of joining as Lower Division Clerk, the respondent therein did not produce any evidence showing his date of birth as The Court held that if he had the certificate issued under the Act, there was no reason for not producing the same, but producing other record as proof of his date of birth is not tenable.

Therefore, the candidate was not permitted to rely upon the birth certificate. The relevant findings are as under:- " There is another reason for our inclination to set aside the impugned judgment.

At the time of joining as Lower Division Clerk in the office of Commissioner, Settlement and Director of Land Records, Madhya Pradesh, the respondent did not produce any evidence showing his date of birth as At the time of his appointment in as Personal Assistant in the employment of appellant No.

Rather, he got the date of birth entered in the service book by producing copy of the judgment of the trial Court, which had already been set aside by the lower appellate Court on If the respondent was possessed with the certificate issued by the Corporation under the Act, then there was no earthly reason for not producing the same for the purpose of recording of date of birth in the service book.

However, the fact of the matter is that instead of relying upon the birth certificate, the respondent produced copy of the judgment of the trial Court and got his date of birth recorded as Therefore, the Division Bench of the High Court committed serious error by setting aside the orders passed by learned Single Judge. In matters relating to appointment to service various factors are taken into consideration before making a selection or an appointment.

One of the relevant circumstances is the age of the person who is sought to be appointed.

It may not be possible to conclusively prove that an advantage had been gained by representing a date of birth which is different than that which is later sought to be incorporated. But it will not be reasonable to presume that when a candidate, at the first instance, communicates a particular date of birth there is obviously his intention that his age calculated on the basis of that date of birth should be taken into consideration by the appointing authority for adjudging his suitability for a responsible office.

In fact, where maturity is a relevant factor to assess suitability, an older person is ordinarily considered to be more mature and, therefore, more suitable. In such a case, it cannot be said that advantage is not obtained by a person because of an earlier date of birth, if he subsequently claims to be younger in age, after taking that advantage.

In such a situation, it would be against public policy to permit such a change to enable longer benefit to the person concerned.

This being so, we find it difficult to accept the broad proposition that the principle of estoppel would not apply in such a case where the age of a person who is sought to be appointed may be a relevant consideration to assess his suitability. In such a case, even in the absence of a statutory rule like Rule A, the principle of estoppels would apply and the authorities concerned would be justified in declining to alter the date of birth.

If such a decision is challenged the court also ought not to grant any relief even if it is shown that the date of birth, as originally recorded, was incorrect because the candidate concerned had represented a different date of birth to be taken into consideration obviously with a view that that would be to his advantage.

To that extent the decision in Manak Chand Vaidya v. State of H. Chadha , 3 SCC , the Supreme Court again applied the principle of estoppel as to why he did not move an application to get the date of birth corrected when certificate was issued. In the instant case the higher secondary examination certificate was issued on 3. Merely because in an opportunity was granted to the government employees to get their date of birth correct, that does not take away the effect of inaction and continued silence for more than three decades, which dehors laches on his part would seriously reflect on the bona fide nature of the claim itself.

Even in the application made for employment in the year , the date of birth was indicated, as noted above to be No contemporaneous document was produced to show that recording of the date of birth to be Accepting the plea of the respondent would result in two public records, educational on one side and service on the other reflecting two different and conflicting dates of birth.

Such anomalous situations are to be averted and not to be countenanced. Bajrangi Rabidas , 13 SCC , when it has been held as under:- " The controversy can be viewed from another angle. Thereafter, the learned Judges opined that there is no justification in the proposition that principle of estoppels would not apply in such a situation.

It is well settled in law that jurisdiction of the High Court under Article of the Constitution is equitable and discretionary. A lawyer's notice can be issued before filing the case.

Ashish Davessar. Ajay Sethi. Available Now. Ajay N S. T Kalaiselvan.

Pradeep Bharathipura. Nadeem Qureshi. Ask a Lawyer Get legal answers from top-rated lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous! Ask a question Get legal answers from top-rated lawyers. Anyway legitimacy of the agreement does not rely on stamp paper. It thoroughly relies on the s What is the procedure and documents required for charitable trust?

A Charitable Trust is made with the end goal of the advantage of the overall population or humanity. In all these claims we have an accidental claim that has grown with the development in the present time. The term can also be used with organizations, Section 8 companies non-profit companies under the Companies Act, , societies, trusts, etc.

Not all non-profit organizations are charitable organizations. A will is the intention of the person testator and his plans of what he wants to do with the property which he had acquired throughout his life. Bail is conceded during the pendency of the trial of an appeal. This is the last stage in the application procedure, finishing the procedure. Building Control Surveyors complete nearby reviews at different phases of development.

Is binary trading legal in India? The Indian version differs from the U. Majority of the customers are gamblers and pay house edge What are the punishments under section , , ? Rectification or Confirmation deeds are also known as amendment deeds.Change of Name of the Society. The Court held that if he had the certificate issued under the Act, there was no reason for not producing the same, but producing other record as proof of his date of birth is not tenable.

What is Digital Marksheet? A criminal case may in a few jurisdictions be sett LIC employment policies and judgments applicable regarding it. Manju singh, In 2th mark sheet: However, it was subject to change in the manner prescribed in the Punjab Civil Services Rules and the Financial Rules.