DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGES PDF
PDF | Domain-specific languages (DSLs) are languages tailored to a specific application domain. They offer substantial gains in expressiveness and ease of. PDF | Over the last three decades, an increasing number of It involves Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) and automatic code generation. Goal of domain-specific languages (DSLs). ▻ Programming languages have fixed, built-in features. ▻ These are generally useful features. ▻ We speak of.
|Language:||English, Spanish, German|
|Country:||United Arab Emirates|
|ePub File Size:||22.45 MB|
|PDF File Size:||20.68 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
to build them. Domain-specific languages (DSLs) successfully address this challenge through .. URL resourceone.info~biboudis/resourceone.info Streaming . books/Implementing Domain Specific Languages with Xtext and Xtend - Second resourceone.info Find file Copy path. @varmaprr varmaprr Add files via upload. Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) have been around since I've been in computing, but it's hard to find much information InformIT has epub and pdf versions.
FilterMeister[ edit ] FilterMeister is a programming environment, with a programming language that is based on C, for the specific purpose of creating Photoshop -compatible image processing filter plug-ins; FilterMeister runs as a Photoshop plug-in itself and it can load and execute scripts or compile and export them as independent plug-ins. Although the FilterMeister language reproduces a significant portion of the C language and function library, it contains only those features which can be used within the context of Photoshop plug-ins and adds a number of specific features only useful in this specific domain.
MediaWiki templates[ edit ] The Template feature of MediaWiki is an embedded domain-specific language whose fundamental purpose is to support the creation of page templates and the transclusion inclusion by reference of MediaWiki pages into other MediaWiki pages.
Software engineering uses[ edit ] There has been much interest in domain-specific languages to improve the productivity and quality of software engineering. Domain-specific language could possibly provide a robust set of tools for efficient software engineering.
Such tools are beginning to make their way into the development of critical software systems. The Software Cost Reduction Toolkit  is an example of this.
The toolkit is a suite of utilities including a specification editor to create a requirements specification , a dependency graph browser to display variable dependencies, a consistency checker to catch missing cases in well-formed formulas in the specification, a model checker and a theorem prover to check program properties against the specification, and an invariant generator that automatically constructs invariants based on the requirements.
A newer development is language-oriented programming , an integrated software engineering methodology based mainly on creating, optimizing, and using domain-specific languages.
Further information: Metacompiler Complementing language-oriented programming , as well as all other forms of domain-specific languages, are the class of compiler writing tools called metacompilers. A metacompiler is not only useful for generating parsers and code generators for domain-specific languages, but a metacompiler itself compiles a domain-specific metalanguage specifically designed for the domain of metaprogramming.
Besides parsing domain-specific languages, metacompilers are useful for generating a wide range of software engineering and analysis tools. The meta-compiler methodology is often found in program transformation systems. Metacompilers that played a significant role in both computer science and the computer industry include Meta-II  and its descendent TreeMeta.
This allowed for rapid development of modifications compared to the competitor Quake using the Id Tech 2 engine.
The Id Tech engine used standard C code meaning C had to be learned and properly applied, while UnrealScript was optimized for ease of use and efficiency. Similarly, the development of more recent games introduced their own specific languages, one more common example is Lua for scripting.
Rules Engines for Policy Automation[ edit ] Various Business Rules Engines have been developed for automating policy and business rules used in both government and private industry. The purpose of Business Rules Engines is to define a representation of business logic in as human-readable fashion as possible. This allows both subject matter experts and developers to work with and understand the same representation of the business logic.
It gives details on the modular architecture of the tool and elaborates on the support for inter-procedural analyses. The two key characteristics are variable-precision and extensibility. The latter one mean that analyses, similar to languages, are extensible, and making an analysis work on language compositions requires only minimal additional effort. This paper discusses the implementation of the debugger for complex DSLs from the mbeddr stack.
This language is used extensively for testing the mbeddr debugger. We illustrate how we used these advantages in order to build the mbeddr stack of domain specific languages. The various supported notations are illustrated with examples from real-world systems, most of them are taken from mbeddr. In contrast to the next paper, it looks at mbeddr more from a tooling perspective less from language engineering and also contains some preliminary experience of using mbeddr. It details some of the challenges for embedded software development, and how mbeddr addresses them.
However, they do not facilitate programmers with built-in debugging support for language extensions.
This paper presents an extensible debugger architecture that enables debugging of language extensions. This is established by defining mappings between the base language and the language extensions. We show an implementation of our approach for the mbeddr language workbench.
Domain Specific Languages
It points out how the various extensible modules could be used to create high-integrity and robust systems. It contains examples from the Pacemaker Challenge.
The approach relies on using language extension to provide meaningful abstractions directly in the language, avoiding the need to "reverse engineer" the semsntics from low-level implementation code.
We show two examples for formal verification in mbeddr.
Log in to Wiley Online Library
By hooking the verification onto the single core language, we can get verification support for several DSLs with very limited effort. This is obviously very relevant to prospective mbeddr users as well.The two key characteristics are variable-precision and extensibility. A different approach in composing the coordination and the problem domain DSLs, respectively, can be given by a ad—hoc scripting language as described by .
Programming Pearls : Little Languages. The various supported notations are illustrated with examples from real-world systems, most of them are taken from mbeddr. Eshius and Wieringa in  define a formal execution semantics for UML activity diagrams that is appropriate for workflow modelling, then a comparison of Activity Dia- gram and Petri Net is given in .